Forums


Go Back   The TrekEarth Forums >

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Good Paker 2005-03-09 16:07

The quality of this photo is not very good but the subject is interesting...
regards,
Krzysztof

  #1  
Old 03-10-2005, 12:11 AM
KevRyan KevRyan is offline
TE Expert
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,386
Default To Paker: Amber Spinner

I know Krzysztof! .....as an artist I always find it interesting how people define/use the word quaility - the quality of an image or in the plural - the qualities of an image - very different! Thanks for commenting!

best wishes

Kev
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-10-2005, 02:10 AM
Paker Paker is offline
TE Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 370
Default Re: To Paker: Amber Spinner

Hi - I thought about your reply for a while, read your note once again and tried to understand you :-). I think you did what you could with the equipment you had. As for quality or qualities of pictures... yeah, i agree that there are more levels to it than just one.

Of course I was talking about the technical quality of this picture which overshadows the artistic quality (the women's gaze, colors, composition etc.) Personally, I believe that pictures should have the technical qualities as it reflects the photographers knowledge and understanding of the equipment (the camera) he is using. That's a skill in itself and I think it should be respected when taking a picture. Artistic qualities (composition, theme, angles etc.) is a completely different matter and I think the stretch is much much wider. That's why pictures are so amazing.....
regards,
Krzysztof
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-10-2005, 02:27 AM
KevRyan KevRyan is offline
TE Expert
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,386
Default Re: To Paker: Amber Spinner

Hi - I agree with you to a degree (almost wholely) - it depends upon the purpose a photo is to be used for or the intention and preoccupation of the photographer - there are great photographers who deliberately utilise low tech equipment and poor image quality and others who combine their creative gifts and development with technical skill to a high degree - and there are others who don't experiment too much but produce otherwise technically perfect work - I think photography is a broad church - I admire good technical photographers - the 'perfect' image makers - but personally - after a while - find it a bit like going to the market and always finding perfect vegetables - I like more variety in my photography. Here I admire the efforts people make whatever their technical ability and the things people show about where they have been, live or have travelled through (the real purpose of TE) - there are many reasons for liking photographs here. If I make photos for an exhibition then I have a different set of criteria to base my choices and work on, if it's for a fast turn around magazine in print or on the web it's different again. If I'm running photography work with kids or doing commissioned work to produce a specific image for something or other my approach is very different.

However, you are absolutely right in terms of learning whatever you need to know in order to take the photographs you want - in some ways I am very satisfied in this way but......a big but .......there is still a whole world to learn!

Thanks for taking the time to communicate your thoughts on this - much appreciated!

bw

KEv
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:19 PM.



Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.
explore TREKEARTH